Grounded in your operations
We interview the people doing the work and look at the real volumes, not the org chart. The opportunities that matter are usually invisible from the executive summary.
The costly mistake is not picking the wrong model. It is spending two quarters automating something that was never worth automating. We start with the operational reality - where time and money actually go - and produce a sequenced plan with the numbers attached.
From$2,500
The two-day diagnosis: readiness assessment, ranked opportunity map and a costed roadmap you keep.
Indicative starting price. The fixed fee for your scope is quoted after the two-day diagnosis, before any build begins.
What makes it work
We interview the people doing the work and look at the real volumes, not the org chart. The opportunities that matter are usually invisible from the executive summary.
Each candidate gets an estimated build cost, running cost, payback period and risk rating. Build, buy and do-nothing are all costed side by side, including the ones we would not profit from.
The plan front-loads work that is visibly valuable and low-risk, so the organisation builds confidence and internal capability before you attempt anything ambitious.
Capabilities
An honest read on data, systems, skills and governance, with the specific blockers named.
Workflow-level inventory of what is automatable, ranked by value and effort.
Vendor evaluation against your requirements, including total cost and exit cost.
Acceptable use, data handling, human oversight and review cadence, written to be usable rather than filed.
Workshops that leave your team able to evaluate proposals and spot the ones that will not work.
In detail
A category name is not a scope. These are the individual pieces of work inside this practice - take the two that apply to you and ignore the rest.
An honest read on data, systems, skills and governance, with the specific blockers named rather than scored on a maturity curve.
A workflow-level inventory of what is automatable in your business, ranked by value against effort.
Build cost, running cost, expected benefit and payback period estimated per candidate, so options can be compared on the same basis.
Comparing a custom build against available products on total cost, fit, switching cost and time to value, including the do-nothing option.
Requirements definition, shortlisting, reference calls and commercial review, including exit cost, which almost nobody checks before signing.
What data you actually hold, what is usable today, and what genuinely needs fixing first rather than as a precondition for everything.
Acceptable use, data handling, human oversight and review cadence, written short enough that people follow it.
The plan itself: what to do in which order, front-loading visible low-risk value so the organisation builds confidence before attempting anything ambitious.
A session that leaves your leadership able to evaluate an AI proposal and identify the ones that will not work.
What you receive
Around three weeks end to end. That comes from scoping tightly to one workflow - not from skipping a phase. Each still ends in evidence you can check.
Further reading
Let's talk
The strategy engagement is a fixed fee and the roadmap is yours whether or not you build with us. If the honest answer is that AI is not your priority this year, that is what the document will say.
Related practices