Handles unstructured input
Invoices, contracts, forms, emails and scanned PDFs are read, understood and turned into structured records - the category of work that traditional RPA could never reach without a rigid template.
The expensive work is rarely inside a system. It is the person moving information between them - rekeying invoices, chasing approvals, reconciling two exports that never quite match. That work is now automatable, including the messy, unstructured parts that defeated older rule engines.
From$3,500
One mapped process automated end to end, with exception paths and a human review queue.
Indicative starting price. The fixed fee for your scope is quoted after the two-day diagnosis, before any build begins.
Start small
Fixed scope, fixed price, five working days
Pick the one repetitive job that costs you the most time. We scope it on a thirty-minute call, build it, and it is running in your systems within five working days of kickoff. If it is not running by day five, there is no invoice.
When it is live you can stop there. No retainer is attached. If you want more built, the second workflow is quoted from the same spec format, and the diagnose phase is where a wider roadmap starts.
What makes it work
Invoices, contracts, forms, emails and scanned PDFs are read, understood and turned into structured records - the category of work that traditional RPA could never reach without a rigid template.
Automation that only works on clean cases creates a worse mess. Every workflow has an explicit confidence threshold and a human review queue, so ambiguity surfaces instead of propagating silently.
Each step records its input, its decision and its reasoning. When finance or a regulator asks why something was approved, the answer is a record, not an archaeology project.
Capabilities
Extraction, validation and posting for invoices, POs, claims, onboarding packs and compliance forms.
Workflows that span ERP, CRM, helpdesk and finance without a person as the integration layer.
Policy-aware routing with thresholds, delegation and automatic chasing of the person holding it up.
Matching across sources, with unmatched items explained rather than dumped in a spreadsheet.
Throughput, touch rate and cycle time per workflow, so you can see what automation actually bought you.
In detail
A category name is not a scope. These are the individual pieces of work inside this practice - take the two that apply to you and ignore the rest.
Mapping where time actually goes, step by step, with volume and handling time measured rather than estimated in a workshop.
Workflows that span ERP, CRM, helpdesk and finance without a person acting as the integration layer between them.
Policy-aware routing with thresholds, delegation and automatic chasing of whoever is holding it up.
Records matched across sources, with unmatched items explained and queued rather than dumped into a spreadsheet.
An explicit confidence threshold and a staffed review queue, so ambiguity surfaces to a person instead of propagating silently.
Removing the rekeying between two systems that both hold the same record for different reasons.
Replacing brittle screen-scraping bots that break whenever a form or page changes.
Allocating jobs, shifts or vehicles against constraints that are genuinely too complex to solve by hand each morning.
Recording input, decision and reasoning at every step, so "why was this approved" is a query rather than an investigation.
What you receive
Around three weeks end to end. That comes from scoping tightly to one workflow - not from skipping a phase. Each still ends in evidence you can check.
Free calculator
Further reading
Let's talk
Pick the workflow your team complains about most. We will map it, cost it, and tell you honestly whether automating it is worth doing - including when the answer is no.
Related practices